Platform Architecture
Revocation and Status
A credible trust system must represent negative and changed states, not just positive ones.
Revocation and status logic define how changing support conditions alter public verification state.
This route sits inside the platform architecture family and exists to explain one structural part of the verification system in focused, indexable detail.
Key Points
What matters on this route
Revocation and status logic define how changing support conditions alter public verification state.
A credible trust system must represent negative and changed states, not just positive ones.
Platform architecture pages should explain how a specific layer behaves, not repeat high-level homepage language.
Each platform route should bridge into docs, trust, implementation, and adjacent platform concepts.
Route Detail
How this page fits into the CITAQ system
Revocation and status logic define how changing support conditions alter public verification state.
A credible trust system must represent negative and changed states, not just positive ones.
CITAQ is large enough that major platform concepts need isolated pages with their own metadata, schema, and internal-link role.
Connected Routes
Keep moving through the route graph
See how this concept fits into the broader infrastructure story.
Move into the docs system for method and reference detail.
See how this platform layer eventually shows up in public trust routes.
Open the integrations system for the upstream inputs that support this layer.
Next Step
Use the workflow route to see this layer in sequence.
The architecture page shows how the different platform layers work together across ingestion, verification, and trust output.